Instantly Assess Third-Party AI Risk Scores for Free

AI risk often enters the organization through third-party vendors, yet insight into those systems is still driven by point-in-time questionnaires that quickly go stale. This free assessment lets you instantly assess the AI risk of third-party GenAI systems using continuously updated risk intelligence.

Kovrr AI vendor risk intelligence dashboard showing OpenAI with an overall risk score of 80.56%, including model/app risk 56%, business criticality 100%, data and regulation exposure 100%, and company risk 67%. Vendor insights highlight high risk profile and high regulation exposure with recommendations.
Continuously Monitor Third-Party AI Risk in Real Time
Third-party AI vendors evolve constantly. This assessment replaces point-in-time questionnaires with continuous insight into how AI systems operate and when risk conditions change.

How the Third-Party AI Risk Assessment Works

Enter the name of a GenAI system or vendor, such as ChatGPT, and instantly receive a vendor AI risk report. The third-party risk assessment surfaces current risk signals based on Kovrr’s internal risk models and intelligence sources, providing a point-in-time view that’s far more informative than static questionnaires. The final report is designed to support discussion and decision-making, not to serve as a certification or compliance ruling.

AI Vendor Risk Intelligence search interface with a search bar to enter vendor names or domains and example buttons for OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, and Google.
Kovrr's AI risk assessment dashboard showing an overall risk score of 80.56%, with sub-scores: model/app risk 56%, business criticality 100%, data and regulatory exposure 100%, and company risk 67%.

What the Third-Party AI Risk Assessment Includes

Each third-party AI risk assessment score opens with a concise, actionable summary of risk signals tied to the specific vendor you searched.

The entire report includes:

  • Third-party identity and report timestamp

  • An overall AI risk score

  • A clear risk level indicator

  • A breakdown across core AI risk dimensions

  • Audit-ready documentation for compliance processes

Understanding What Drives the AI Risk Score

The assessment does not treat risk as a single number. It shows how different factors contribute to overall exposure, so you can see how risk accumulates across areas such as:

  • Model and application characteristics

  • Business reliance on the system

  • Regulatory exposure based on jurisdiction and use

  • Company-level risk signals

  • Implementation and usage considerations

This breakdown helps explain why a third-party GenAI system carries risk, not just that it does, making the score easier to interpret and discuss.

Kovrr risk score breakdown showing model/app risk at 56%, business criticality and data & regulatory exposure at 100%, and company risk at 67%, with vendor insights detailing high risk profile, high regulation exposure, multiple security incidents, strong security certifications, enterprise data controls, and recommended usage policies.
List of four security incidents including Italy GDPR Fine, Dark Web Credential Exposure, ChatGPT Credential Theft, and Redis Library Bug with respective dates, descriptions, resolutions, and severity levels.

Signals That Shape the Third-Party AI Risk Picture

Beyond scoring, the assessment highlights notable findings that shape the third-party's AI risk profile. These details may include:

  • Security certifications and governance signals

  • Infrastructure and deployment patterns

  • Known incidents or areas requiring attention

  • Regulatory considerations tied to AI use

This context turns raw data into something that AI risk management and AI governance teams can discuss and act on.

Why Instant Third-Party AI Risk Visibility Matters

Third-party AI systems introduce exposure in ways traditional vendor assessments were not built to capture. Model behavior, training practices, deployment models, and regulatory obligations all affect risk, yet these factors change faster than point-in-time reviews can reflect. Without asset-level, current visibility, organizations struggle to justify approvals or explain decisions once scrutiny increases. This report shows what becomes visible when third-party AI applications are evaluated as assets rather than abstractions.

Vendor information showing company profile, technical infrastructure, privacy and data handling, and security certifications for OpenAI Inc.
Dashboard showing AI Asset Visibility with total assets, sanctioned, shadow AI, pending review, blocked, and 3rd party counts, plus detailed assets inventory listing asset names, vendors, statuses, owners, technical owners, risk tiers, regulatory compliance, lifecycle, personal data presence, and action links.

From Generalized Scores to Full Third-Party AI Asset Visibility

This experience is intentionally scoped to provide fast, targeted insight without setup or integrations. Kovrr’s AI Asset Visibility module extends this approach across your organization by mapping all AI systems in use, including third-party tools, embedded AI, and internal deployments. What begins here as a single assessment can scale into continuous visibility across your entire AI footprint.

Transform Third-Party AI Risk Into Actionable Metrics

Start with the free third-party AI risk score assessment to understand the risk a third-party system introduces and why asset-level visibility matters before decisions are made.